History of  Persian Miniature painting
              The   origins of Persian painting unquestionably predate the advent of Islamic    civilization in Persia. From the 3rd century AH onwards with the   emergence of local ruling dynasties and the growing influence of distinguished   Persian figures at the Abbasid court, Persian cultural and artistic traditions,   which had remained stagnant for several centuries, because pre-Islamic Persian   art had been based on their ancient Persian wisdom.
              Mongol   hordes invaded and devastated Persia during the 7th and   8th century AH. Genghis khan’s invasion began in 615 AH and lasted   until 619 AH. Holaku khan army marched into Persia and razed Samarqand in 654   AH. Before taking control of Baghdad and overthrowing the Abbasid dynasty three   years later. Timur’s repeated bloody onslaughts at the close of the   8th century left many Persian cities in ruins and innumerable people   dead. In the course of these savage invasions, wall paintings inside palaces   were destroyed and thousands of manuscripts both illustrated and non-illustrated   were burned to ashes when libraries across the country were put to   flame.
              This   explains the scarcity of pictorial works from before the Mongol invasions,   either in the form of illustrated manuscripts or wall paintings.
             
              Il-khanid   painting in Tabriz 
              Political   stability gradually returned to Persia after the last Il-khans embraced Islam   and adopted the indigenous Persian culture and civilization.
              Thanks to   the managerial skills and the administrative experience the native Persians   brought to the Il-khans government, scientific and cultural activities   flourished and cities began proposing anew. During the rein of Ghazan-khan   (694-703 AH) the physician and historian Rashid-o-Din Hamadani rose to the post   of prime minister. He commissioned on supervised the creation in the suburbs of   Tabriz of Rabe-e-Rashidi, which became the gathering place for numerous   scientists, calligraphers, artists and writers who soon began producing and   illustrating sundry manuscripts in it’s workshops. It was during that era   (Il-khanid period, 8th century AH) that the Tabriz school of painting   reached full maturity. This school best reveals its personality and   particularities in the illustrated copy of the Jame-o-Tavarikh compiled by   Rashid-o-Din himself and said to have been reproduced and illustrated in   approximately twenty Persian and Arabic copies, and in a copy of Ferdowsi’s   Shahnameh (ca.735 AH),  referred to as the Demotte Shahnameh.
              By the   close of the 8th century the Mongols influence had decreased. For   example although they preserve some of the early characteristics such as   attention to realism and representation of human moods and feelings through   their characters postures the illustrations contained in a copy of Ferdowsi’s   Shahnameh, created around 735 Ah for Abu-saeed, display the full refinement and   maturity of Persian art in their decoration, coloring and   composition. 
              The   persistence of the traditions in Persian paintings in Shiraz in the   8th century Ah,
              At the   same time that painting and book illustration flourished in western Persia   around Tabriz, Miniature painting continued its evolution in southern Persia,   Undergoing relatively different developments. In fact escaping unscathed from   the assault of Mongol hordes, the province of Fars and Shiraz witnessed the   natural evolution of Persian painting traditions, free from Mongol influence,   and compositions involving imposing figures, symmetrical structures, purer   colors and more elaborate decoration were perpetuated by its artists.
              The   persistence of the painting traditions of this region, which was more in touch   with the evolution of the school of Baghdad than was Tabriz, is best exemplified   in the illustrations of the Varqheh-va-Golshah manuscript.
              The   decorative features, palette and simple composition of the works produced by the   school of the Shiraz are best visible in the paintings of a Shahnameh created   around 732 AH and today preserved at the Topkapi Saray Museum in   Istanbul. 
              Miniature   painting under the Jalayerids
              The end   of Il-khanid rules after Abu-saeed Bahador-khans death (376 Ah) provided an   opportunity for local governments to emerge across Persia. This period which   lasted until the end of the 8th century Ah (the date of Timur’s   invasion), was a golden era during which the painting styles of western and   southern Persia most effectively came together. In the interim period between   the down fall of the Mongol Il-khans and the onset of Timur’s invasions, the   Jalayerid dynasty enjoyed a more important position, which allowed it to rule   from Baghdad of Tabriz for more than half a century (From around 740-813 Ah).   This interval allowed the artists of these two centers, each of which boasted a   vigorous and longstanding tradition in the art of the book, to better benefit   from their mutual experiences. During Jalayerid patronage, specially during the   reign of Sultan Oveis (739-776 Ah) and Sultan Ahmad (784-813 Ah), who were both   keen supporters of poets and scholars, this merger of experiences led to the   emergence of a purified style of painting at the Jalayerid court in Baghdad. In   fact contacts between the schools of Shiraz and Baghdad in the second half of   the 8th century Ah and the transfer of the artistic experiences   through the artists of the school of Tabriz to the Jalayerid court deeply   affected the development of later schools of art, including that of Timurid   painting. Mention most also be made here of Joneid’s art, which masterfully   combined the heritage of the Shiraz school with the experience of the artists of   Tabriz, producing superb works in the late 8th century Ah, including   the illustrations of Khaju-ye Kermani’s Divan, created in 799 Ah. The works of   Joneid and Khajeh Abd-ol-Hayy, another painter active at Sultan Ahmad Jalayer’s   court, may be considered to have paved the way for the development of the school   of Heart.
              The   extent of which the merger of the experiences of the artists belonging to three   major schools of art (Shiraz, Baghdad and Tabriz) in the Jalayerid period   contributed to the foundation of Timurid art and the emergence of the highly   regarded school of Heart may be measured by the personal notes of the   10th century Ah copyist and painter, Doost Mohammad Govashani. While   introducing Ahmad mussa as the developer and promoter of Persian painting under   Abu-Saeed Khodabandeh, to whom he attributes the Abu-saeed Nameh,   Kelileh-va-Demneh, Meraj Nameh and Tarikh-e Changizi, he notes that Amir   Dowlatyar and Shams-o-Din were his pupils during Sultan Ovis Jalayers rule in   Baghdad. He then elaborates on Shams-o-Din tutorship under Khajeh Abdol Hayy.   After Timure’s conquests and fall of Baghdad, besides working at Sultan Ahmads   court, Shams-o-Din joined Timur’s camp at Samarqand where he began promoting his   style of painting and that of his masters ( the heritage of the school of   Shiraz, Tabriz and Baghdad) before turning to teaching students notably   Pir-Ahmad Baghshomali, who joined Shahrokh’s court in Heart after Timur’s death   and was active in Baysonqor-Mirza’s (802-838 Ah) workshop until his death at the   age of fifty. In preparation of his new library and workshop in Heart,   Baysonqor-Mirza also summoned several painters, book binders, calligraphers and   illuminators from Tabriz. In this way the artistic heritage of the   8th and early 9th century Ah schools of Baghdad, Tabriz   and Shiraz enabled the painting school of Heart to flourish. 
              The Shiraz   School of painting in the 9th century Ah
              The path   toward the revival of the Persian school of shiraz, which occurred in the second   half of the 9th century, was paved during it’s first half, when   Timur’s sons, Eskandar sultan (812-817 Ah) and Ibrahim Sultan (817-837 Ah)   Governed Fars. After Timur’s death and Shahrokh accession in Heart, these two   princes, both keen patrons of artists and writers, successively ruled Fars.   Fortunately, like many other descendants of Timur, they were captivated by, and   immersed themselves in, Persian culture and arts. Painting and book design   acquired great esteem in their courts. The illustrations of one of the most   important manuscripts prepared in 813 Ah for Eskandar Sultan (Jong-e-Eskandar   Sultan) and those of a Shahnameh prepared after him for Shahrokh’s son, Ibrahim   Sultan, are the most significant products of the Shiraz school of painting in   the first half of the 9th century.
              Some   artists active at the court of these two princes had come to Shiraz from   Samarqand and Heart, contributing their experiences to the local school of art.   As a result, a greater maturity was in perceptible in this city’s painting of   the first half of the 9th century. Works produced during this period   display more precise symmetrical composition, more refined landscaping and   better relationship between the text areas and pictorial elements a lighter   palette, the use of decorative elements. More masterfully designed characters   and refined silhouetting of rocks further add tot their refinement.
              The   characteristics of the school of Shiraz at its peak during the second half of   the 9th century Ah are best represented in the illustrations of a   Khavaran-Nameh dated 882 Ah. The major part of this manuscript is preserved at   the Golestan Palace Museum, Tehran. 
              Miniature   painting at Herat in the Timurid period
              Ninth   century Persian miniature painting, inextricably linked with the name of Herat,   is known as the Timurid School of painting. Timur’s son, Shahrokh, had been   appointed governor of Khorasan, Sistan, Ray and Mazandaran. In 799 AH After   Timur’s death (807 Ah), he succeeded on the throne in Herat and ruled until 850   Ah. Although initially faced with feuds and rebellions among provincial   governors, he eventually secured his rule over all Persia and Transoxiana. He   devoted considerable energy to the development of Herat and other cities,   thereby providing an opportunity for the school of Herat to flourish.
              A   manuscript created for Shahrokh around 828 Ah was Hafeze Abru’s   Majma-o-tavarikh, its surviving pages are unfortunately scattered today. Several   pages of this manuscript are preserved at the Reza Abbasi Museum in Tehran;   represent the school of Herat at the time Shahrokh in the current exhibition.   The illustrations of the Majma-o-Tavarikh are simple compositions of large   aligned or opposed characters depicted on a relatively bare background topped by   blue sky.
              Concurrently with Shahrokh, his son Baysonqor-Mirza founded a library   of his own, where he gathered the most talented painters, book binders,   illuminators, and calligraphers of his time. The painters Hajj-Ali Mossavver,   Amir-Shahi sabzevari and Seyyed Ahmad Naqqash, the book binder Qavam-o-Din   Sahhaf and the renowned calligrapher Mowlana jafar Tabrizi were among the   artists busy in the workshop of Baysonqor Mirza’s library.
              Baysonqor   Mirza was a man of letters and a calligrapher and the workshops under his   patronage greatly contributed to the progress of the school of Herat. In fact as   noted above, this prosperity of the school of Herat took place under the   influence, and as a natural result, of the evolution of book illustration in the   school of Tabriz, Baghdad and Shiraz.
              The   beautiful paintings of two superb manuscripts created in this period, a   Kelile-va- Demneh  dated 833 Ah and the Shahname Baysonqory, clearly show the   mastery of artists active in the first half of the 9th century Ah in   Baysonqor’s workshops and the development of the school of Herat in that   period.
              Two other   manuscripts contain illustrations which bear great importance in the study of   the school of Herat in mid 9th century Ah. One is Mir-Heidar’s Meraj   Nameh dated 840 Ah and preserved at the Bibliotheque National in Paris. All the   pages of this manuscript contain illustrations whose vibrant colors an brilliant   gilding make them excellent examples of the applications of the traditions of   Persian Pictorial art, in which the metaphoric atmosphere of Persian painting is   most perceptible. The other is a Shahnameh created for another Timurid prince,   and known as the Shahnameh-ye Mohammad-e Juki.
              As   concerns the particularities of Persian painting in the first half of the   9th century Ah, one may say in general terms that they involve   livelier, less symmetrical scenes than their contemporary counterpart produced   in Shiraz. Their sophisticated colors the precise design of their human and   animal characters. Their attention to the reproduction of nature’s idyllic   landscapes and their relationship to architectural elements constitute important   achievements of the school of Herat in the second half of the 9th   century Ah. Hence this school paved the way for the paintings of Behzad and his   contemporary artists to develop.
              After   Shahrokh’s death in the second half of the 9th century Ah, the   workshops of Herat remained idle until Sultan Hussein Bayqara’s accession in 873   Ah, Sultan Hussein reign over Herat, which lasted until 911 Ah, witnessed the   revival of artistic and literally activities. Assisted by his erudite minister,   Mir Ali-shirr Navai (848- 906 Ah), he gathered prominent artists and men of   letters at his court, creating a circle of learned and talented figures in his   entourage. Among the notable figures in this circle was the greatest artist of   the time Kamal-o-Din Behzad.
              The   brilliant art produced by this talented team in the fourth quarter of the   9th century Ah illumined the entire body of Timuried art, to which it   owes the best part of its universal recognition. Fortunately, after the Timuried   period, a considerable portion of this magnificent heritage was transferred,   thanks to Safavid patronage, to Tabriz, where it gave birth to the most sublime   gems of Persian art.
              Behzad’s   style of painting and the innovations he introduced in the arts of his time   influenced his contemporaries and pupils. This influence remained perceptible,   alongside that of the school of Tabriz.
              Although   Behzad was the most famous artist of his time only a few paintings beer his   distinctive signature “Amal-e al-abd Behzad”.
              Clues to   the importance of Behzad’s personality and art are found in an edict issued 928   Ah by the Safavid Shah Esmaeil, appointing director of the royal library and its   workshops in Tabriz and ordering their entire staff, including scribes,   painters, illuminators, frame draftsmen, gilders and watercolorists, to obey   him.
              
              The Tabriz   school of painting in the Safavid period
              The   Safavids accession to the power in the 10th century Ah brought Persia   religious and political unity and development, as well as historical and   cultural progress and artistic prosperity. Shah Esmail (892-930 Ah), the   grandson of Sheikh Safi-o-Din Ardebili (who was the founder and first monarch of   this dynasty) conquered Tabriz and all Azerbaijan in 907 Ah. From there, he went   on to conquer Isfahan, Yazd, Kerman, and southern Khorassan, before eventually   taking control of Baghdad and Diar-Bakr in 914 Ah, to the detriment of the   Aq-Qoyunloo dynasty. Shah Esmails main achievement after these conquests was his   cleansing of eastern Persia of all Uzbek presence in 916 Ah. After having the   Uzbek Shibak Khan assassinated, he launched a campaign towards Herat, which he   soon conquered. Although some are of the opinion that, after defeating the   Uzbeks, Shah Esmail had some of the artists of the workshops of Herat, including   Behzad, move to Tabriz, this is quite improbable, because the stability needed   for the workshops of the Safavid court to develop did not exist in Tabriz at the   time. More likely, as is recorded in Manaqeb-e Honarvaran, Shah Esmail   kept Behzad concealed in a cave during the chaotic days of the Ottoman armies’   pillage of Tabriz in 920 Ah and the battle of Chaldoran, later taking him, along   with several other artists, back to Herat. They remained there until 928 Ah,   before eventually moving back to Tabriz in the company of the heir to Throne,   Tahmasb-Mirza, because the edict appointing Behzad director of the royal library   and workshops dates from that year.
              Be it as   it may, the presence in Tabriz of Behzad and other artists from the workshops of   Herat played a significant role in the development of the Tabriz school of   painting in the first half of the 10th century Ah. Behzad's   appointment to the direction of the royal library bespeaks the esteem, in which   Shah Esmail held the master, as well as his desire for the royal workshops of   Tabriz to flourish, and indeed, superb works were created there under Shah   Tahmasb.
In addition to the replica watches uk timing function, the watch at 3 o'clock position to replica watches open a window, respectively, the week display and date rolex replica display window, up and down symmetrical layout is also very consistent with public rolex replica ukaesthetic.
               The   Tabriz school of painting, whose illustrious artists were able to step beyond   their heritage of Turkmen and Timurid art, soon gave birth to works of   incomparable magnificence. In step with political changes occurring in the   country, the art that took shape in this school first affected painting in   Qazvin and Mashhad and then reached Herat, Isfahan Shiraz and elsewhere. The   influence of Safvid art even crossed Persian frontiers and, just as Persian art   had penetrated Bokhara in Timurid times, made its way into Turkey and India,   whose painters went on emulating the work of Persian artists for several   centuries.
              More than   in any other period of Persian art, paintings produced in the school of Tabriz   in this era are grandiose and dazzling. They represent the peak of the mystical   art of Persian artists and depict scenes which can only be the products of a   spiritual view of the world. It is as thought the artists of the school of   Tabriz have found the eye of their hearts open to truth concerning the real   world which cannot be seen by those lacking spiritual vision. Their lively   landscapes filled with lively flower bushes, tall cypresses and blossom-covered   trees create metaphoric images of paradise. Their works combine forceful   character design, accomplished coloring and masterful composition with a   meticulous decoration involving precise architectural elements and superb   geometric and vegetal patterns. Their indigo-blue skies strewn with surreal   clouds, colorful birds flying among their foliages, and angels appearing on   earth every now and then, adding a spiritual and poetic touch to their works,   all seem to indicate that the artists of the school of Tabriz have come to   perceive the spiritual and the physical worlds as inseparable.
 These   characteristics are visible in the most outstanding works of the school of   Tabriz such as Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh and Nezami’s Khamseh prepared for King   Tahmasb.
              
              The Qazvin school of   painting in the second half of the 10th century AH,
              After   King Tahmasb’s death, Esmaeil Mirza ascended to the throne as King Esmaeil II.   His reign, however, lasted no more than 16 months, coming to an end on Ramadan   13th, 985 AH with his death by opium poisoning. His accession to the   throne came after a twenty-year-long detention, which probably explains his   embittered, cruel character. Indeed during his brief reign he had many members   of the royal family, including three of his brothers and his cousin Ibrahim   Mirza, the governor of Mashhad and the patron of Jami’s Haft Owrang,   assassinated.